![[Logo]](art/logo_side.gif)




 |
Survivors of Terrorist Victims
Granted Domestic Partnership Benefits |
By Matt Pyeatt
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
October 04, 2001
![[spacing]](art/spacing.gif) (CNSNews.com) - Homosexual partners of those who died in the September
11 terrorist attacks are now eligible to receive relief funds from organizations
who, along with Congress, are beginning to redefine the definition of family in the
United States.
Domestic partnership status has been watched closely in recent weeks.
Congress voted overwhelmingly last week in favor of legislation that would allow
the District of Columbia to spend local funds to establish domestic partner benefits,
while the American Red Cross announced it would give benefits to homosexuals who
lost partners in the September 11 attack.
"Red Cross is a neutral and impartial organization and we help people
who need help. So, we don't help with regards to race, creed, color, religion and
sexual orientation. We help people who need to be helped," Stacey Grissom, media
relations associate for the Red Cross, said.
Grissom said the Red Cross is working with employers to locate information
on victims' nearest living relatives. "So in those cases where the next of kin
is listed as a domestic partner, that would be a person who would definitely get
benefits," she said.
Other large relief agencies such as the United Way are sending donations
to victim service organizations that in turn have indicated they will offer financial
assistance to homosexual domestic partners, Gay.com News reported.
Matt Foreman, executive director of Empire State Pride Agenda, said his
group had received commitments from several relief organizations to assist homosexuals
who had lost their domestic partner in the attacks.
"We have had some success. On the positive side, everyone we have
contacted has been very receptive and sympathetic and saying they really want to
do the right thing for everyone," Foreman said.
"On the negative side, what we're finding is most of these funds,
including the Red Cross, had no written guidelines, at least that they could provide
to govern the granting of benefits to gay survivors or common-law heterosexual partners
or the children of people in either one of those situations," he said.
Foreman said while the issue of domestic partnerships is not new, the
size and scope of the September 11 attacks is forcing relief agencies to deal with
domestic partnerships on a whole new level.
"I think that one positive thing that will come out of this tragedy
is that all of these relief organizations will have to grapple with this issue and
come up with a policy to guide their staff," Foreman said.
Domestic partners still cannot receive government-funded relief in the
forms of social security or worker's compensation, according to Foreman.
"No matter what kind of work we do and no matter how successful we
are with the Red Cross, with United Way, with these various relief funds, gay and
lesbian survivors are still going to face a huge inequity," Foreman said. "No
matter what work we do, we're not going to be able to get them to tap into the key
long-term government supported programs."
Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition, said
money should not be granted to homosexuals who lost partners in the attack.
"[Relief organizations] should be first giving priority to those
widows who were at home with their babies, and those widowers who lost their wives,"
Sheldon said. "It should be given on the basis and priority of one man and one
woman in a marital relationship.
"This is just another example of how the gay agenda is seeking to
overturn the one man-one woman relationship from center stage in America, taking
advantage of this tragedy," he said.
Sheldon said any money given to domestic partners could open a door for
homosexual advocates to go to any court and call attention to the fact that relief
organizations are recognizing homosexual relationships and traditional marriage on
the same level.
"There is no question that groups like the Empire State Pride Agenda
would very much like to redefine what marriage is and how marriage functions and
who enters into marriage," he said. |